|
|
|
|
Why do you need Top 10? This may help answer your questions:
Questions & Answers Courtesy of The Produce Marketing Association
Topic - TraceabilityAs part of the Produce Traceability Initiative, an action plan was prepared and
endorsed by industry leaders in September 2008 and was launched by PMA, CPMA
and UFPA in October 2008. Please refer to the following link for the PTI Action
Plan and associated milestones.
- Who is setting
deadlines for traceability implementation?
The 48 companies that made up the Steering Committee for the Produce
Traceability Initiative (PTI). This group included retailers, foodservice
distributors, growers, shippers, trade associations, brokers, terminal
markets.
- Are there penalties
for not meeting the deadlines?
Adhering to these deadlines is strictly voluntary. However, if the industry
does not meet the deadlines, the federal government will most likely take
this out of the industry’s hands and establish their own deadlines. (See question
#18 for further information.) - Is the GTIN always
assigned by the grower or can it be changed by the distributor?
The GTIN is assigned by the owner of the brand. If the brand is owned by
the shipper, then the shipper is to use their GTIN. If the brand is owned
by the foodservice company or retailer, then the GTIN is assigned by them,
as it is their brand.
- Do you have to
order GTIN labels in advance or can you make them on the fly?
The GTIN and labels are two different things. The GTIN is a number. You
can put the GTIN on any label and affix the label to a case. More relevant
to traceability, the GTIN (the number for the case) needs to be shown in
both human readable form as well as encoded inside the GS1-128 barcode.
These two things (human readable information plus barcode) need to be
shown on the case. As the barcode used (i.e. the 128 barcode) is read most
consistently when printed on a label, it is recommended that the barcode
be printed onto a label and then a label affixed to the case. You can
pre-print them or print them as needed. However, keep in mind that you
also have to include the LOT #, which sometimes is a consideration that
would dictate whether you should pre-print labels or print them as
desired.
- What is the
compatibility with COOL? If the state is already printed on the product,
do we need to print the country of origin?
The traceability requirements are completely separate from COOL. Keep in
mind, the traceability requirements are at the CASE level only, not at the
ITEM level. For additional information on COOL, please refer to the
following page on PMA’s website, http://www.pma.com/issues/labeling.cfm.
- Does the receiver
have to maintain all of their suppliers GTINs and lot number information?
The receiver must read and store the GTIN and LOT # of every case
received. Used with the one-step-up and one-step-down provision is what
enables whole chain traceability.
- Does all (or any)
information contained within the GTIN need to be included on individual
packs?
The GTIN is a number. For traceability purposes, it is the number used to
identify the case. If you use a UPC number to identify the items inside
the case, then you link the item UPCs to the case GTIN. Example:
|
CASE GTIN
|
PACK
|
ITEM UPC
|
Case Description
|
|
10666666555553
|
12
|
666666001237
|
12-pack Iceberg lettuce
|
|
10666666444441
|
24
|
666666001237
|
24-pack Iceberg Lettuce
|
- What group is the
data synchronization best practices document geared to: grower/shippers or
buyers or both?
Both. Data synchronization is sent from the seller to the buyer. The
seller needs to know how to send the information, in what format, etc. The
buyer needs to know how to receive it, in what format, and how to store it
in their systems. The document is currently being drafted and will be
posted on PMA’s website.
- How does the
traceability initiative apply to customers not connected electronically?
None of the PTI milestones require companies to be connected
electronically. However, the milestones can be accomplished more
efficiently, faster and cheaper with electronic connectivity and
automation. The degree of automation will be up to each trading partner
relationship.
- Is there a central
data archive?
No. This would be an extra step for individual companies to have to send a
“feed” to a central repository on every transaction. This is NOT necessary
at this time, provided that companies follow the milestones and have the
necessary information available for the FDA at the time of a recall.
- Are lot numbers
standardized?
No. Because of the diverse formats of lot numbers, the only requirement is
that the lot number be NO MORE THAN 20 characters long. The characters can
be alpha numeric.
- Is there any
economic benefit from a traceability strategy related to product liability
insurance? In other words, do you save by having a strategy (or
insurance)?
This is a question to take up with your insurance carrier or legal counsel
as many factors influence insurance rates.
- Will we be able to
or how can organic and conventional product be handled together (re:
assignment strategy)?
Refer to the GTIN Assignment Strategy for details.
- How do you label
product with multiple lots of the same item (i.e. 3 or more different
growers/lot numbers) on the same pallet?
You are required to provide a LOT # for the case, not the pallet.
- Can we include
marketing information, brands etc. on the case labels?
Yes, as long as you have the minimal data needed for traceability shown on
the case (refer to the Case Labeling Best Practices).
- Is there a discount
through GS1 for PMA members to obtain a company prefix?
No.
- What is the GTIN
assignment strategy for private label? How will the supplier be
identified?
In the situation of a private label product, the buyer is responsible for
creating the GTIN number. As the owner of the brand, the buyer can
identify the supplier by either (1) using the supplier information shown
on the case (see Case Labeling Best Practices) or (2) electronically
working with the buyer on a strategy to designate supplier as part of the
GTIN or Lot #.
- Have we solicited
help from FDA and USDA for enforcing the standards?
FDA is aware of the PTI and supports our efforts. As of now, these
milestones are self-regulated between industry partners. Many buyers will
be expecting each milestone to be completed and, beginning with Milestone
#3, will know when their sellers have not followed the Action Plan.
- What steps does a
company need to take to determine the total cost to implement GS1
standards into their company?
There are too many variables to offer an accurate answer. The costs vary
by size of company, buyer or seller, whether you use labels, use barcodes,
and if your database is equipped to store GTINs.
- Is it necessary to
use the GS1-128 exclusively?
Yes. The GS1-128 barcode is a linear barcode that holds up to 48
characters of information. The PTI steering committee agreed on this
standard barcode to ensure scanner compatibility, widespread usage, and
that it can hold the required data.
- The purpose of the
traceability initiative is to provide traceability and primarily, in the
case of an outbreak, the package or container is discarded so we are
depending on the data behind the GTIN – not the number itself – correct?
The number is used as a reference to get to the case of product that is
being discussed. In your database, you can have as many attributes that
are linked to the case number as you desire. This number, along with its
attributes, would typically be stored in your master database so that when
you reference the GTIN number, you do not need to repeat all of the
attributes associated with that GTIN. This is critical when using a
barcode as we can only fit a few numbers in the barcode, not the
descriptors that make up the number.
- If you have 10
growers packing a private label on the same product, do you have to have
10 different GTINs?
The private label brand owner must designate the GTIN. If they choose to differentiate
between the different growers by using the GTIN, rather than by other
means, they would need to give each grower a different GTIN. If, however,
they choose to use other means to differentiate their suppliers (e.g. as
part of their Lot #), they can give all the growers the same GTIN number.
- If you are a
processor and you receive the product from a grower, does the traceability
initiative also apply?
Yes. As a processor, you will be responsible for knowing where the inputs
are coming from that created your finished product. You will also be
responsible for knowing where you ship it.
- When or will the
USDA adopt this initiative? Are PMA and the FDA discussing how recalls and
traceability are handled?
PMA and UFPA have met several times with both the FDA and the USDA to
educate them on the Produce Traceability Initiative. Both agencies are
supportive of our efforts. We continue to meet with these agencies to keep
them abreast of our progress as an industry. In addition, we are meeting
with them to ensure they have the industry knowledge that would hopefully
prevent any more unnecessary massive recalls.
- If, as a
grower/shipper, we receive the same product from different growers, is a
different code needed for each?
The GTIN on the case should identify the brand owner. If a grower procures
product from another grower they do not need to put a new GTIN on the
case, unless they plan on packaging it under their brand or altering the
case contents. Note, the buyer will need to know that they are shipping
them different GTINs so that they can read this information on the case
when scanned.
- Does the GTIN get
recorded at the store and restaurant level or only at the distributor
level?
Milestone #6, which requires companies to read and store INBOUND case
information, does NOT apply to individual stores and restaurants. The
needed information for trace back will come from the distribution center
that shipped product to the store or restaurant.
- If product gets
reworked because it does not meet quality standards, does a new GTIN need
to be assigned?
The general rule of thumb is that whenever the case configuration or
contents of the case are altered in any way, it requires a new GTIN.
- Who polices the
traceability initiative and enforces the milestones/action plan? Are there
any consequences when someone doesn’t comply?
Currently, the milestones of the PTI are self-regulated by industry
members. However, individual buyers will begin checking for conformance
once Milestone #3 begins, as it is the first milestone that requires their
participation as well.
- Who mitigates
disputes/issues?
As this initiative is self-regulated by industry members, there is no
official source that will help mitigate disputes.
- Is there an
endorsement or mandate from the FDA re: the traceability initiative?
There is no FDA mandate currently in place. Lacking industry progress, FDA
may establish far more burdensome mandates.
- How do we have transparency
from the packer in the fields through to the consumer (i.e. bagged
salads)?
The PTI was not organized to develop greater transparency for the
consumer. The purpose of PTI is to enhance traceability within the supply
chain so that product can be traced quickly and efficiently.
- How can bulk
product be traced when there are no barcodes available at the shelf?
The PTI is focused at the CASE level. There are other initiatives that are
focused on item level identification.
- Will the GTINs be
placed on the bill of lading?
Ideally, yes. If the buyer orders using the GTIN, then the bill of lading
should have the list of GTINs that were ordered for the purpose of
reconciliation. However, there is no mandate that requires this.
- What happens once
your product is no longer in its original packaging – repacking or
processing?
The repacker gives the “new case” a new GTIN and Lot #. They will then
have to link this new number to the old number coming from each of the
inputs that made up the new item.
- Will the
information need to go back to the bag level (i.e. how does an illness get
from the bag to the case)?
Ideally, you would have a number on the ITEM (a UPC or item-level GTIN)
that would link back to the CASE number. However, if the number on the
item is not available, the buying location involved in the recall will use
their purchase orders to determine which cases of product were sold during
the recall period. They will then know which GTIN and Lot #s were
potentially involved.
- Why did the produce
industry take so long to react to the spinach/tomato outbreak and develop
a traceability initiative?
The industry has been working on common coding standards for many years.
Many companies have developed their own traceability programs. What has
become evident is that we need to link those internal traceability
programs with an external traceability program – the PTI. This is part of
the ongoing evolution within the industry to improve and enhance food
safety and traceability efforts. What’s important here is that this has
been developed by and is being driven by industry.
- What other
traceability solutions are available?
There are NO other industry-led initiatives for traceability. Individual
vendor solutions require everyone to use (or interface with) their
proprietary system. The PTI allows companies to have their own internal
traceability systems. It also allows for connectivity through the use of
standards without having to send transactional feeds to a central
repository.
- Is 2012 a realistic
deadline?
YES, according to the 48 companies involved in the formation of the
milestones and timelines.
- How does a retailer
track bulk items?
The PTI is focused at the CASE level. There are other initiatives that are
focused on item level identification.
- How will local
growers track their product?
The PTI milestones apply to the entire industry
- How will non-GS1
codes be handled?
The standard is a GTIN at the CASE level. The PTI does not recognize
non-GS1 codes.
- What steps are
needed once I have registered for a GS1 company prefix?
Refer to Milestones 2 – 7. The milestones are in the order by which they
should be implemented.
- If we have a pallet
code and an item code (i.e. code on the clamshell), do we need a case code
as well?
Yes. A pallet code, or more specifically the Hybrid Pallet Label, will give
you information on all of the cases residing on a single pallet. However,
once that pallet is broken down and mixed with other cases of product on a
mixed pallet (i.e. at most distribution centers), the case information
will need to be scanned to know when that case of product left that
facility. They will not be able to get this information off of the pallet
(as they have created a new pallet) or the clam shell (as they will not be
opening the case at the distribution center).
- What are the
guidelines that we should follow for creating the product catalogs?
You can use the Data Synchronization Best Practices once they are
completed.
- How would shippers
communicate to buyers (retailers and foodservice)?
The PTI does not prescribe how shippers communicate with their buyers. Trading
partners can use various methods to share GTIN information. The Data
Synchronization Best Practices are being drafted and will provide
additional guidance.
- How will the
traceability standards affect the smaller shipper?
If a shipper does not already use case labels, pallet labels and/or
barcodes, they will need to begin doing so. The PTI milestones apply to
the entire industry.
- If I don’t re-label
or repack, what are my obligations under the traceability action plan
timeline?
The PTI encourages all supply chain partners to meet the various milestone
deadlines. Please refer to the milestones and deadlines outlined in the
action plan.
- What are the
storage requirements of the data at each level?
ACTION: The PTI agreed to use the same retention requirements as that of
the Bio Terrorism Act.
Topic - DataBar
- What percent of
retailers have the capability of scanning DataBar?
PMA recently conducted a survey of all US retailer members. 57% of US
retail members are either scanning DataBar now or are accepting DataBar,
but have not fully implemented yet. The exact percent of retailers capable
of scanning DataBar is not known.
- What will happen if
the scanner isn’t capable of scanning DataBar – will it reject the scan?
Yes. They will essentially get a “Not on File” read.
- Will DataBar
benefit the consumer? Will product be able to be traced back using
DataBar?
Product would only be able to be traced back using DataBar if the consumer
kept the label after consumption. Otherwise, retailers can proactively
contact consumers using a frequent shopper card to let them know if they had
purchased a GTIN coming from a specific grower/shipper that is being
recalled.
- What is the timing
for DataBar becoming a common standard used for produce?
As the DataBar is not an industry-led initiative for implementation, the
implementation will be handled trading partner by trading partner. To
clarify, the DataBar is not a standard, but a barcode. It will be up to
the marketplace on how fast it will be adopted.Whose responsibility is it
to link the PLU to the GTIN?
Those who create their GTINs.
- When UPCs are
scanned at retail, they identify the supplier. What about private label –
whose GTINs are used?
The owner of the private label.
- What happens if the
consumer puts multiple apples in a plastic bag with different DataBar
labels - will the cashier accurately collect the information from each
apple?
Cashiers will likely have a similar practice with DataBar as they do with
PLUs. Currently they enter the PLU and key in the quantity. With DataBar
they will likely scan one and then key in the quantity. Cashiers will need
to become more aware of the possibility so that correct information is
captured.
- Is the GTIN on the
case the same GTIN that is used on the item? Are there best practices or
guidelines established?
Although the GTIN at the case level and the GTIN used in a DataBar at the
item level have the same format/protocol, they are NOT the same number.
One number represents the case, one number represents the item. A subgroup
under the Produce Electronic Identification Board (PEIB) is creating Best
Practices on using the DataBar at the item level. The GTIN Assignment
Strategy has already been created for the use of assigning GTINs at the
case level.
- Does the DataBar
contain all of the same information as the GTIN used for traceability at
the case level? If not, what is different?
Remember, the DataBar is a barcode. The GTIN is a number. The DataBar used
for produce can only hold 14 digits and is designed to hold the GTIN
number (which is 14 digits long). The GTIN is used to (1) link the brand
owner to a specific product, as well as (2) to identify something (e.g. a
case, an item, etc.). So where the GTIN is used to identify a case, it is
also used to identify an item when using the DataBar on the item.
- Does the DataBar
refer you to the GTIN which contains additional information? Are they one
in the same?
The DataBar is just a barcode. The GTIN is a number (similar to the UPC).
The number is the reference used to identify a product having unlimited
information tied to that number.
- Would DataBar take
the place of a pre-printed UPC (i.e. wrapped lettuce, romaine hearts?
As long as you are using your GS1-issued Company Prefix as part of the
UPC, you do not need to change anything. The DataBar is meant to be
printed on items that currently have a PLU sticker on them. If you have
enough room to put a UPC on the item, that is perfectly acceptable.
- Once DataBar is
fully implemented in the industry, will the PLU be eliminated?
The answer to that is unknown at this time. More immediately, the PLU will
act as a backup in the event the DataBar does not scan. In comparison, the
UPC has the 12-digit human readable version underneath the UPC barcode, to
act as a backup if the UPC does not scan. The sticker used to print the
DataBar does not have enough room for the 14-digit human readable to show
underneath the barcode in the event the DataBar does not scan. As such,
our vision is that the PLU will remain for quite some time.
- Is DataBar being
accepted in the foodservice industry?
There is no need for the DataBar to be accepted in the foodservice
industry as it is designed to be affixed to an item that will be scanned
at point of sale (which is in retail, not foodservice).
Topic - RFID
- What is it about
RFID that doesn’t work today?
RFID does work, but it has challenges around water and metal.
- What is the cost of
using RFID?
There are too many variables to cite an exact cost. On average, the cost
of a passive RFID tag is between 15 and 30 cents and the cost of an RFID
reader is between $1500 - $3500. But then you have systems costs and
middleware costs, all of which vary tremendously depending on your
existing systems and other factors.
- How much will the
cost of tags decrease? And when will they decrease?
A lot of R&D is being done to make RFID more viable and affordable. No
one can accurately predict how fast the cost will decrease.
- Is there an
industry definition for shrink that can be used to help validate the
internal traceability value of RFID across companies?
There is no standard definition for shrink. However, RFID, if implemented
correctly across the supply chain, can certainly help reduce shrink by
measuring dwell times and temperature behaviors that can adversely impact
shelf-life of product.
- What solutions are
there for water/metal barriers?
Currently, there are semi-passive or semi-active tags that can address
some of these problems, but the cost of these tags are significantly higher
than passive tags.
- What is on an RFID
chip?
The most fundamental part of an RFID tag is an inlay. An inlay has a chip
and added circuitry. An active or semi-active tag also has a battery
(hence, why they are more expensive). This inlay needs to be embedded on
some form of substrate (e.g. a label, directly into corrugated, etc.),
which is an additional cost.
- Are there other
frequencies being used beyond the applications being used today?
There are “frequency wars” going on between countries and standards
organizations. Although making headway, it is a very difficult process to
land on a standardized frequency to be used for RFID around the world.
- What are the
downstream recyclable issues with the tags?
There are tags that are read/write capable that could be recycled.
However, it depends on the format by which the inlay is embedded. For
example, if embedded into an RPC, the tag would also be reusable. However
if the inlay is embedded into corrugated cardboard, it will probably have
only one use. Also a consideration would be the life of the battery on the
tag. Once the life of the tag has expired, it would be difficult, but not
impossible, to extract it from the case just for recycling.
Topic - Data Synchronization
- Where do we get
assistance on data synchronization?
The PTI Data Synchronization Best Practices document for case
synchronization is currently being drafted and will be available on PMA’s
website.
- Are retailers willing
to bypass B2B platforms for data synch?
That will depend on the retailer.
- Who is the primary
beneficiary of the initiative? In what specific situations will this solve
an issue?
Both the buying community and the selling community will benefit. Here are
some benefits:
For the buyer:
- Can track consumer
purchases by grower/shipper
- Can track shrink by
grower/shipper
- Can accurately ring
up conventional vs organic
- Added traceability
For the seller:
- Will have product
movement data supporting your sales versus your competitor
- Will have accurate
shrink data from buyers
- Will potentially be
able to market/price product differently from competitor
- Will allow for
differentiation between commodity growers/shippers
Topic - Data Pools
- What’s the most
mature industry using the GDSN (Global Data Synchronization Network)?
The packaged goods and retail apparel industries.
- What other data
pools are available?
Refer to the GS1 website www.gs1us.org for information on data pools.
- Can you provide
more information on the data sync subgroup?
The PTI Synchronization Subgroup will address Milestone #3 in the PTI
Action Plan. It recognizes the inability to use GS1’s GDSN for bulk
products not having a unique UPC or GTIN at the item level, as well as the
reliance produce companies have on third party service providers.
|
|
|